Friday, December 3, 2010

Ultimate Freedom: A Brief Analysis According to 3 Great Philosophers



In Nietzsche’s The Gay Science, the Madman goes to a marketplace in order to deliver the message that “God is dead” and that “we’ve killed him” to the people. However, he soon realizes he is the messenger who has come too early. The people he speaks to are still in the ascetic realm and do not realize the importance of the aesthetic. They still believe in the church and Judeo-Christian values and do not understand that the church is merely a catacomb for God, who is dead. And no, God is not dead in a literal sense nor did he once exist. Rather, Nietzsche believes the use of the Christian God for moral reasoning is no longer functional in society. The church represents inauthenticity. It is a structured institution that keeps people in line, providing them with security and comfort. This, however, limits peoples’ freedom and choices. This is further depicted by Nietzsche’s herd mentality in the sense that those who are part of organized religion go along with the crowd. They are just part of the masses rather than the Dionysion individual that Nietzsche pushes. Both Sartre and Camus reflect Nietzsche’s view of God in their works, emphasizing individual freedoms and choices representative of the Dionysion individual.

Sartre enforces that “freedom is existence, and in it existence precedes essence.” This means that we are not born into who we are, but rather our actions and choices in life define who we are. Thus, God does not instill a sense of purpose into our lives at birth. The defining of oneself happens at every given moment, so one must always be cognizant of his or her actions. This freedom of choice is the crux of Sartre’s beliefs. It represents authentic living. The opposite of authentic living is “bad faith,” introduced in Being and Nothingness. An example of bad faith is allowing roles to take over one’s life, making our actions monotonous and restricted. In this case, we are not free. “A grocer who dreams is offensive to the buyer, because such a grocer is not wholly a grocer. Society demands that he limits himself to his function as a grocer… There are indeed many precautions to imprison a man in what he is” (Being and Nothingness, 336). Similarly, the Christian that Nietzsche describes only plays a role. He prays, reads the Bible, goes to Church, and devotes his life to God within a societal institution. This represents the same kind of inauthentic living and bad faith as does the grocer who is trapped in his role by the imprisonment of society. Both the Christian and the grocer surrender their freedom for a secure role in a societal collective. Nietzsche and Sartre frown down upon this.

Like Nietzsche, Camus rejects God in his work, The Stranger. A Christian chaplain tries to convert the protagonist Meursault before he is to be put to death for his crime of murder. The chaplain tells Meursault that God can help him. Meursault, however, refuses this. He says, “I didn’t want anybody’s help, and I just didn’t have the time to interest myself in what didn’t interest me” (The Stranger, 117). This is because Meursault recognizes the absurdity of life. Life has no greater meaning or purpose; the world does not provide a basis for human value. This is related to the “Death of God” and how Judeo-Christian values, including a belief in a life of purpose as well as an afterlife, do not apply. Meursault ultimately embraces “the gentle indifference of the world” (The Stranger, 122). He accepts the absurdity of the world and his imminent death. In fact, he finds freedom in the execution that awaits him. “They were announcing departures for a world that now and forever meant nothing to me. For the first time in a long time I thought about Maman… So close to death, Maman must have felt free then and ready to live it all again” (The Stranger, 122). With this passage, Camus addresses the inevitability of death. There is no discussion of an afterlife. Thus, it is implied that one should not live a Christian lifestyle in order to look forward to an afterlife. Rather, one should place more urgency on his or her “projects” in life, knowing that death in inevitable. These “projects” include our actions and choices made based on free will.

No comments:

Post a Comment